Victoria Neave Wins SD16

Victoria Neave wins SD16 per a story in left leaning Flip Texas Blue stating poll numbers show the state representative winning the race.

The article says Neave wins the SD16 race if the election were held today. The poll reflects voter recognition of her leadership and work in the Texas legislature.

Victoria Neave Wins SD16

Victoria Neave Criado is the daughter of an immigrant and was the first in her family to graduate from college.

Today, she is a lawyer and is a leading voice in the Texas State House since her election in 2016.

Neave In Legislature

In the Texas legislature, Victoria secured a major legislative victory with landmark legislation, the Lavinia Masters Act. That law combined with an unprecedented $50 million tackles the rape kit backlog. This brings long-overdue justice to thousands of survivors of sexual assault.

The male dominated state senate has ignored the rape kit backlog for years. The boys club likes to claim to be tough on crime while ignoring rape and sexual assault.

As the Chairman of the Mexican American Legislative Caucus (MALC), she fights Governor Abbott’s radical agenda.

Neave supports public schools and put a stop to Abbott’s taxpayer-funded private school welfare program.

She receives credit for her work to stop police profiling by race.

She also received credit for her work to stop attacks on people of color and our LGBTQ community.

Flip Texas Blue appears to be providing news on Democratic campaigns across Texas.

Victoria Neave Wins SD16 – Major Race To Watch

Other Side Dallas will continue to bring breaking Dallas news regarding politics and the community.

Voting Rights Hearings

Voting Rights Hearings

Two voting rights hearings are taking place later today in Austin, Texas in legislative hearings on Senate Bill 1 (SB1) and House Bill 3 (HB3) during the Texas legislature’s Special Session.

Voting Rights Hearings

HB3 will be heard starting at 8AM in Capital Room E1.030. The Senate bill being heard today will start in committee at 11AM in Capital Room E1.004.

It is unclear in what order committees will take up legislation so activists expect a long day of hearings.

The state legislature is taking up legislative funding, voter fraud, but general political corruption seems to be missing despite the recent federal conviction of Ruel Hamilton.

Voting Rights Hearings Open To Public Comment

Persons wishing to speak on either bill in person can do so through this link. You may only register from a personal device if you are connected to the Capitol Public WiFi inside the Capitol, Capitol extension or John H. Reagan Building. 

The state house of representatives allows speakers to submit comments electronically. Comments for or against the legislation can be submitted here.

The state senate does not allow online comments.

Zephi Trevino

Zephi Trevino

Zephi Trevino, is a Texas teen is accused of Capital Murder in connection with the fatal shooting of a man that occurred when she was 16. Dallas District Attorney John Creuzot intends to charge her as an adult pending a January 4, 2021 hearing.

John Creuzot's office will prosecute Zephi Trevino

Her mother and other advocates, including Jamie Lee Curtis and Kim Kardashian West, say she is a victim of sex trafficking, not a killer.

Kim Kardashian West tweet defends Zephi Trevino

Zephaniah Trevino, now 17, is one of three people charged with capital murder in the fatal shooting of Carlos Arajeni-Arriaza Morillo, 24. He was killed in a Grand Prarie apartment in August 2019.

Alleged murderess Zephi Trevino's victim.
Murder victim Carlos Arajeni-Arriaza Morillo

Another defendant, Philip Baldenegro, then 18, admitted to fatally shooting Morillo and shooting and injuring another man as part of a robbery attempt. He and Jesse Martinez, then 19, are all charged in the case.

Attorney David Finn represents Baldenegro.

“She brought the guys to the apartment and set the whole thing up,” said Finn.

Zephi Trevino’s parents and Baldenegro’s attorney agree the men were there to have sex with Zephi, but Zephi’s parents claim Baldenegro was forcing their daughter to have sex for money.

Baldenegro’s attorney says his client admits he pulled the trigger, but he is not a pimp.

“She is no victim. My client Philip Baldenegro is 19 and I think she was 16 at the time. They had a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship that is born out on my client’s cellphone,” said Finn.

“She engineered, organized, executed the entire plan,” Finn said.

Alleged murder Zephi Trevino reported accomplices Philip Baldenegro and Jesse Martinez
Murder suspects Philip Baldenegro and Jesse Martinez

Zephi Trevino Background

Zephaniah, or “Zephi” as she’s known to friends and family, was a typical teenager in her Grand Prairie, Texas community. Kind, outgoing, and the youngest of four siblings raised in a loving home, she was involved in activities from her church worship team to pitching for her high school softball team.

Zephi Trevino at softball

Trevino’s mom, Crystal Trevino, told local media her daughter was offered a plea deal that would give her 10 years in prison, but declined.

Crystal said her daughter played sports and was involved in her church before she fell in with the wrong crowd, saying the plight of her daughter Zephi Trevino is “a mother’s worst nightmare.”

Zephi Trevino Case

Crystal Trevino says her daughter was offered a ten year plea deal, which she declined. She faces up to 40 years in prison. Trevino’s case has caught the attention of numerous celebrities.

Jamie Lee Curtis supports Zephi Trevino

Civil rights lawyer Justin Moore is helping the family and helped get the attention of Jason Flom, a founding board member of The Innocence Project.

Flom says he thinks Dallas District Attorney John Creuzot should take a closer look at the case.

“On what planet does it make sense that we are going to charge her with capital murder? It’s a disastrously failed social policy,” Flom said.

The Innocence Project, has helped secure the release of hundreds of wrongfully convicted people.

Zephi Trevino, John Creuzot, and Dominque Alexander

The case also presents an interesting challenge for Creuzot.

Recently, former Chief of Police Reneé Hall was reported to be in an inappropriate relationship with convicted felon and local activist Dominique Alexander. The public report hastened Hall’s exit as police chief and her depature was announced less than twenty-four hours after the report.

Creuzot has not been seen out front on sex trafficking issues unlike the local US Attorney’s Office who recently arrested a local man for sex trafficking. Additionally, like Reneé Hall, Creuzot is known to be friendly with Dominque Alexander and there are multiple sources who indicate Creuzot made a nonprosecution with Alexander and Next Generation Action Network in return for not endangering his election campaign with Alexander’s activism in certain neighborhoods.

John Creuzot and his office are prohibited from speaking about the Trevino case, but he is noticable silent on relationships with both Alexander and Judge Audrey Moorehead, recently arrested for DWI.

Texas HB196 A Focus For Texas Legislature

Texas HB196

A source in Austin reports State Representative Terry Meza‘s Texas HB196 will be a focus for the Texas legislature in the upcoming session starting in January 2021. One Republican said it was “better than Christmas.”

Texas HB196
Meza seen here with Beto O’Rourke – the former candidate who said Hell yes, we‘re going to take away your guns.

Meza sparked a backlash when she proposed changes to the state’s “castle doctrine,” through Texas HB196, which allows the use of deadly force to protect property.

Facebook has numerous posts attributed to Meza regarding HB196. Calls and emails to her office were not returned so these statements have not been validated.

HB 196 Facebook Post

Privately Republicans are rejoicing saying Democrats have stepped in the muck again.

The point to rising crime numbers throughout Dallas and other cities including officers being attacked and the Democrats filing a bill to stop citizens and home owners from protecting their own property.

One legislative staffer said Denton County had to arrest Dallas’ serial killer because their police chief is in a relationship with a BLM activist with a felony record. Instead of protecting the public, they are filing HB196 which looks to protect criminals.

Some Democrats complain too continuing a pattern of infighting since Election Day when Democrats failed in their expectations to be leading the state house in 2021.

We just lost every winnable seat possible and we have state reps thinking HB196 will bring the suburbs back to voting for us. Democrats continue to say ‘we did it‘ while losing winnable races.

Meza’s bill filing comes just as a local Democrat and criminal judge was arrested for DWI.

Texas HB196

The specific text of Terry Meza’s bill can be found here and is included below.

87R1395 JCG-D
 
 By: MezaH.B. No. 196
 
 
 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or
 property.
        BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
        SECTION 1.  Sections 9.32(a) and (c), Penal Code, are
 amended to read as follows:
        (a)  A person is justified in using deadly force against
 another if the actor:
              (1)  is [if the actor would be] justified in using force
 against the other under Section 9.31; [and]
              (2)  is unable to safely retreat; and
              (3)  [when and to the degree the actor] reasonably
 believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
                    (A)  to protect the actor against the other’s use
 or attempted use of unlawful deadly force; or
                    (B)  to prevent the other’s imminent commission of
 aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, or aggravated
 sexual assault[, robbery, or aggravated robbery].
        (c)  Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2), a [A] person who is
 in the person’s own habitation [has a right to be present at the
 location where the deadly force is used], who has not provoked the
 person against whom the deadly force is used, and who is not engaged
 in criminal activity at the time the deadly force is used is not
 required to retreat before using deadly force as described by this
 section.
        SECTION 2.  Section 9.41, Penal Code, is amended to read as
 follows:
        Sec. 9.41.  PROTECTION OF ONE’S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person
 in lawful possession of land, including a habitation on the land, or
 tangible, movable property is justified in using force against
 another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the
 force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s
 trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.
        (b)  A person unlawfully dispossessed of land, including a
 habitation on the land, or tangible, movable property by another is
 justified in using force against the other when and to the degree
 the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to
 reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force
 immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:
              (1)  the actor reasonably believes the other had no
 claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or
              (2)  the other accomplished the dispossession by using
 force, threat, or fraud against the actor.
        SECTION 3.  Section 9.42, Penal Code, is amended to read as
 follows:
        Sec. 9.42.  DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
 justified in using deadly force against another to protect land,
 including a habitation on the land, or tangible, movable property
 if the actor:
              (1)  is [if he would be] justified in using force
 against the other under Section 9.41; [and]
              (2)  [when and to the degree he] reasonably believes
 the deadly force is immediately necessary:
                    (A)  to prevent the other’s imminent commission of
 arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the
 nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
                    (B)  to prevent the other who is fleeing
 immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated
 robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the
 property; and
              (3)  [he] reasonably believes that:
                    (A)  the land or property cannot be protected or
 recovered by any other means; or
                    (B)  the use of force other than deadly force to
 protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or
 another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
        SECTION 4.  Sections 9.32(b) and (d), Penal Code, are
 repealed.
        SECTION 5.  The change in law made by this Act applies only
 to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.  
 An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is
 governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,
 and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.  For
 purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the
 effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred
 before that date.
        SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2021.